![]() ![]() Territorial autonomy, ethnic conflict, and secession: Between a rock and a hard place? In Handbook on decentralization, devolution and the state, ed. ![]() Ethnofederalism: The worst form of institutional arrangement? International Security 39 (1): 165. Federal solutions to ethnic problems: Accommodating diversity, Exeter studies in ethnopolitics. Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies 8 (1): 58–80. Los pueblos indígenas en el buen vivir global, un concepto como herramienta de inclusión de los excluidos. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House. Federalism and Iraq’s constitutional stalemate. Sören Keil and Allison McCulloch, 171–199. South Tyrol’s model of conflict resolution: Territorial autonomy and power-sharing. Guest Editor’s introduction: Squaring the circle: Constitutionalism and pluralism in overseas France, IACL-AIDC Blog, November 3. Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law 4 (1): Article 2. Multiculturalism and constitutionalism in Latin America. Current challenges to multinational federalism in India. Īdeney, Katharine, and Harihar Bhattacharyya. Does ethnofederalism explain the success of Indian federalism ? India Review 16 (1): 125–148. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 63 (4): 626–641. A step towards inclusive federalism in Pakistan? The politics of the 18th amendment. Baogang He, Brian Galligan, and Takashi Inoguchi, 101–123. In conclusion, this contribution identifies three common and novel traits among ethnic federal systems, namely, that most are a recent creation and have yet to give sufficient attention to the shared-rule element of federalism, that they have only recently shifted from mono-ethnic conceptions of the state and nation to a multiethnic or plurinational recognition, and that this recognition of difference and the associated holding-together federalization process tend to result in an asymmetrical federalism.Īdeney, Katharine. ![]() This framework is applied to different world regions and to the analysis of rationales and peculiarities of federal and decentralized systems with ethnic elements in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. It explains how federal theory interprets ethnic and territorial federalism, and ethnoterritorial federalism, and it discusses state formation and its implications for multinational state-building. This contribution demonstrates that no global theory of federalism exists and that federal systems encompass also states that formally are not called federations. The specific objective is to explain fundamentals as to the functioning of some federal systems subsumed in the category of multinational or ethnic federalism. This contribution explores how federalism is employed for multinational state-building and sheds light on the topic of federalism and ethnic relations at large. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |